Final Jury

Our final jury was on the first day of June. It was very challenging for me to be prepared for the submission time. I did not sleep for a week but finally, it is over! The second year of our architecture education has come to an end. Maybe we can say that we are half architects 😀

For the final jury, I complete the missing parts of my house which are discussed at second prejury. First, I start with defining the roads and the neighboring houses that beside my house and changing topography lines to define a pedestrian and a car entrance according to that roads. These two entrances meet at the center of the house which strengthens the idea of collecting and distributing central area. Also with the topography lines, I arranged the levels according to my decisions about which part of the house will be buried, where the terrain will continue over the house and create small front and back gardens that can be reached from the upper level.

zeyneptugtekin_juryposter

For the final jury, I did not add any new references. I only used my previous references:

  • Olson Kundig’s The Pierre’s glass corner widely opens to integrate the interior and the outside. I used this for my public living space and entrance part to make them integrated with the front yard both with physically and visually.
  • Onur Teke’s T House’s private part is strictly separated from the public part and has a small connection with the common area. I used this idea for my bedrooms part on both floors of my house.
  • MeMo House’s central stairs connect not only the two floors but also the two different parts of the house. It also provides visual connections between the floors. I used these ideas to design my central collecting and distributing area which is accessible from all parts of the house.
  • Finally, Olson Kundig’s Bigwood Residence’s chimney divides the public area according to their usage purposes. It also structurally carries the building and the roof. At my house, again I used the chimney to divide the big living space and to create an outdoor semi-open space that works with the roof.

Besides these, to handle the cold weather I oriented my house through the south and made the south facade with big windows to take the more sunlight in. On the other hand, I totally buried the north part of the house and give the slope of the roof through the north to prevent cold north winds. I located the totally closed rooms at the buried part such as a garage, storage room, toilets. Also burying provided me privacy for my bedrooms.

Moreover, I want to say that first floor is master bedroom floor and has a sauna 😀 You can watch the snowy landscape while relaxing and chilling with the heat.

After finishing the model, drawing the plans and sections was hard for me because until that time I drew everything by hand (which makes me feel more comfortable). Learning and being quick on computer drawing at one week made me very stressful. At least, I succeed maybe not the best but the enough.

IMG_2698

Case Study

A list of architectural projects was given to us as case studies to analyze the theme of “house”. Because this semester we will design a project by taking references from house designs of many different architects and many different terms and scales. We will learn to adapt the references to our own projects. Therefore, the case study is a very important assignment for us to understand how architects deal with the environmental conditions, climate, landscape and how to achieve functional organization of the interior space, choice of material and structure. We also analyzed the houses by focusing on different themes such as:

  • border conditions: boundaries, peripheries, enclosures, transparency, permeability …
  • continuity & discontinuities: continuance of edges or surfaces, visual & other means of relating interior & exterior, relations with topography & landscape…
  • dominance: dominance of one part over others, spatial hierarchy & distribution…
  • motion & movement: the movement patterns inside and outside the building, spaces for circulation & spaces for meeting/gathering, paths connecting the building to its context…
  • interface: hinges, thresholds, edges; spaces for interconnection…
  • tectonics: tectonic qualities of the building, choice of material, hinges, structural aspects…

We provided our analytical discoveries through plans and sections in 1/200 scale. Also, we drew diagrammatic sketches that show our interpretations.

  1. Le Corbusier, Villa Roche, Paris, 1925
  2. Louis Kahn, Esherick House / Pennsylvania, 1961
  3. Sou Fujimoto, Tokyo Apartment, Tokyo, 2010
  4. Estudio Campo Baeza, The House of the Infinite, Spain, 2014
  5. Andrew Burns, Crescent House, Sydney, 2013
  6. Alataş Mimarlık, Uşaklıgil Evi, istanbul, 2006
  7. ARX Portugal, House in Matinhal, Portugal, 2007
  8. Kentaro Takeguchi & Asako Yamamoto, Hall House 1, Japan, 2007
  9. Olson Kundig, The Pierre, Washington, 2010
  10. Luis Barragan, Barragan House and Studio, Mexico, 1958

Architectural Survey

Architectural survey is measuring and drawing a building to analyze its characteristics. We were assigned to go to Mama Gusto building to practice the techniques of the architectural survey and produce a drawing set (plans, sections, elevations) of the place.

We separated into groups and every group measured different parts of the building. Our group’s part was taking two sections from the short edge of the building. All we measured the building through the zero line that we determined by the hose technique that our instructors have shown us. We needed that line because the ground was not flat. After that, we measured the diagonals of every rectangle and drew the sketch of the building and wrote the measurements.

Measuring and drawing small details of the windows, indentations and tiny level differences was very hard.

Then, every group has drawn their own part on the AutoCAD. Measurements of the diagonals were necessary to draw accurately. Because the things that we saw as flat, the walls, windows etc, could be skew and in an architectural survey it is a must to draw according to that. We used diagonals as diameters of the circles and the intersections of the circles gave us the points.

Untitled-1

Finally, all we brought together the drawings and made a set of drawings with 2 plans, 2 sections and 3 elevations in 1/50 scale.

zeyneptugtekin_survey-page-001