When we visited the site, I have realised mostly three category are exist in the site:
- Buildings: main reason of the discontinuity between city and the coast. They rupture the relation between site and the Kumla Creek.
- Bridge: It is the only connection between the two sides of the creek. However, it is not useful because it does not suggest anything at the other side rather than a sludgy pathway.
- Nature: Despite to every intervention to the wetland, it still can continue to exist at the opposite side of the creek. However, reformation of the creek’s flow direction ruptures the relation between the water and the earth so does the wetland.
more and more Architect 